Author Roger Crew Precinct M-I 41-0789 Summary/Argument This allows the Executive Board to amend the bylaws by 2/3 vote of its representative members. The effective date of the amendment is delayed for 30 days so that PCOs have a chance to respond if they so choose. The vote is null and void if sufficiently many ... Read more

Author Chris Roberts Precinct SHL 32-0267 Summary/Argument The proposed revision shrinks the size of the delegation of the 1st, 31st, and 32nd LD by 50% and other districts by 1/3. It is important that there be fairness in the representation of the Executive Board across the county. With redistricting looming, it is possible that more ... Read more

Author Chris Roberts Precinct SHL 32-0267 Summary/Argument When we get close to the general election, it is not in the best interest in the Party to call a PCO meeting. Our party’s focus should be to elect Democrats to office, meaning a focus on GOTV activities. Text of Change Amend Section 5.3.1. to add a ... Read more

Author Chris Roberts Precinct Sh 32-0267 Summary/Argument Redundant and conflicts with the process and procedure is described in 8.3.6. Text of Change Delete Section 8.3.3.

Author Chris Roberts Precinct SHL 32-0267 Summary/Argument Section 11.1 says that the County and LD are peer organizations. It is possible that an LD might choose to reorganize before reorganization of the KCDCC, making the first sentence of the proposed bylaws inoperable – and should be struck. The second change recognized that the KCDCC Chair ... Read more