What does this do: clarify the role of the Endorsement Committee and define partnership between KCDCC and LPO’s in facilitating the successful election of Democrats per our charter as an organization.
Author Chris Roberts Precinct SHL 32-0267 Summary/Argument Section 3.1 is clear about who the voting members are. Section 3.2 gives rights (including the right to attend all KCDCC meetings [not defined], speak and make motions) to anyone across the world who desires to volunteer and agrees to have their name listed as a members. Theoretically,…
Author Roger Crew Precinct M-I 41-0789 Summary/Argument This allows the Executive Board to amend the bylaws by 2/3 vote of its representative members. The effective date of the amendment is delayed for 30 days so that PCOs have a chance to respond if they so choose. The vote is null and void if sufficiently many…
Author Chris Roberts Precinct SHL 32-0267 Summary/Argument Unnecessary limitation on the powers of KCDCC. Members are defined in section 3.1 and the first paragraph reiterates that participation shall not be denied for failure to pay membership dues. Text of Change Delete second paragraph of Section 3.3
Author Chris Roberts Precinct Sh 32-0267 Summary/Argument Redundant and conflicts with the process and procedure is described in 8.3.6. Text of Change Delete Section 8.3.3.
Author Chris Roberts Precinct SHL 32-0267 Summary/Argument The proposed revision shrinks the size of the delegation of the 1st, 31st, and 32nd LD by 50% and other districts by 1/3. It is important that there be fairness in the representation of the Executive Board across the county. With redistricting looming, it is possible that more…
Author Derek Richards Precinct KCYD Chair Summary/Argument This amendment would change the current proposal of restructuring the voting members for King County Young Democrats to remain at three, the Chair (or any alternates as defined in proposed Section 7.2.56) and two elected KCDCC Reps of different genders. Where as: It is in the interest of…